A Review Of The Copyright reform (Week 5)


Review

The principal purpose of this review is to discuss changes in Copyright Reform. The authors claim that want  to  keep  copyright  for  commercial  aims, but they want to set all non-commercial copying and use it for free.

To be honest, I agree with this document that copyright law should be revised because today’s ban on  non-commercial  sharing  of  culture  between  private  citizens  are threatening  fundamental  rights,  such  as  the  right  to  private  communication,  freedom of information,  and  even  the  right  to  due  process.

Authors suggest some good and perspective proposals to have a freedom of information:
Photo 1: DRM free [1]
  • Moral Rights Unchanged
  • Free Non-Commercial Sharing
  • 20 Years Of Commercial Monopoly
  • Registration After 5 Years
  • Free Sampling
  • A Ban on Digital Rights Management
To sum up, I believe that all mentioned above about the copyright system must either be reformed or abolished outright. All of these changes will help achieve free file sharing between individuals also many new and exciting forms of cultural expression will be able to continue to develop. I especially hope that new innovations such as DRM programs will be reviewed and will not limit the ability of consumers and citizens to use and copy works.

References:

1. Christian Engström MEP; Rick Falkvinge. “Copyright Reform”, Greens/EFA-group in the European Parliament, 2012, p. 1-102. [1] 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two interesting cases about online censorship and about privacy (Week 11)

Hacker Ethic In The Modern World (Week 12)

One of the Ten Commandments by Virginia Shea (Week 7)